(June 5, 2012 at 5:37 pm)Drich Wrote: What I am saying is that without a more complete understanding of God you are stuck with a singular perspective of God, as George was. at best with your perspective you can only ever to hope to further explain goreges intentional jabs, all based off of the perspective Carlin himself thought to be accurate. One that was completely based off of the religious views of the version of the church he knew.
What is a non-singular perspective of god?
If one were to study all christian sects and choose one, that is still singular. Reading the bible and arriving at one's own conclusion is also singular. Any ONE true way is singular.
The complete understanding/singular perspective of god dichotomy begs the question: 'Why wasn't or isn't god more succinct?'. Don't give me the mysterious ways canard. It's like being tossed an unpinned hand grenade, which has limited options: 1. Run like hell (my current physical condition prevents proper escape velocity) 2. Jump on it and suffer the consequences (I'm too enarmored with my limited existence) 3. Pray it doesn't explode (has never worked) or 4. Throw it back (highly successful).
