(June 24, 2012 at 6:41 pm)Brian37 Wrote: But that does not change that in this instance the advocates for "GOOD he deserved it" crowd, miss the long term picture.
If there were a dispute about the nature of the charge, you'd have a case. If someone tried to argue "hey what's wrong with raping a kid", then you'd have a case.
The only difference between the disagreements here are NOT that what the perp did was good. No sane peserson, not you not me, thinks what happened was good. But long term how we as a society react when people even MERELY GET ACCUSED.
Maybe you are pissed because I didn't burn the accused upon hearing it?
Firstly, I have to edit your post, so you are not quoting parts that have nothing to do with your reply. Don't worry. I'm just shortening the part you quoted and changing nothing else.
Secondly, I never said "good, he deserved it." Welcome to the strawman club.
I'm not pissed at anybody. I merely asked you what you think he did wrong in your opinion and stated that it was not murder, by the law's definition or mine. That is all. Where did I say I wanted you to burn the accused upon hearing "it?" Which makes fuckall for sense, by the way.
