Atheism Destroyed in Under 50 Seconds

[Ace Otana]

t the only logically possible explanation for B is A. That is, A is the only thing that ever even possibly causes B. Suppose you don't have any evidence that A has ever happened. But then you see that B happened. Can't you infer that A happened?

No. How can you state that A (for which hasn't been demonstrated to exist) be the only possible cause to B? I could state that X is the only possible cause and look, there's B so X must be true!!!

Wrong! It doesn't work that way. You can state that A or C or D or E or F or G, ect ect were the ONLY possible cause but they'd be just as valid as each other. Just as likely (which is not at all to be realistic). Unless you can demonstrate that A exists and is the cause, nothings going to change.

Here's your argument thrown back at you -

You can only exist through the intervention of pixies, now pixies haven't been proven to exist but look! You exist, so there for pixies must exist!

See why it fails?