RE: Atheism Destroyed in Under 50 Seconds
July 4, 2012 at 2:11 pm
(This post was last modified: July 4, 2012 at 2:11 pm by Ace Otana.)
Quote:It was given in the hypothetical that A is the only cause of B. Since X is the only possible cause, X = A.Then you've answered it yourself haven't you. For me, A hasn't be demonstrated to cause B. That's pretty much the end of it.
Quote:Well, I would say that he hasn't shown "You can only exist through the intervention of pixies".Just as I would state that you haven't shown that only god can create the universe. Or that a god exists.
Quote:Your claim is that in order to prove that A caused B, you must first show that A exists, and then that A caused B.It's a fucking standard. Bloody fucking hell.....!!!
*Slaps head* SHEESH!!!
Quote:Now, if I can provide an example of an A and a B, such that I can prove that A caused B without first proving that A exists, then I will have shown that your claim is false.Alright, go do it. Demonstrate that A caused B. Prove me wrong.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
