(July 4, 2012 at 4:55 pm)gringoperry Wrote:(July 4, 2012 at 3:51 pm)Skepsis Wrote: What he is trying to do is create a hypothetical where God would be the only possible explanation for event X. He says that, if this hyothetical came to pass, the claims that you need to prove God before you can prove that God did something loses its validity. However, in which universe will this hypothetical ever come to pass, where only God as he personally defines it can cause an event that only said defined God could accomplish?
This will never happen, and everyone here knows it, but this argument doesn't seem anywhere near its close.
Mooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!! Clive is not playing fair, he is trying to change the rules of the game in his favor, and it's not fair!!!
LMAO and in the other thread he is lying his ass off, braying and bleating that he doesn't assert the existence of his fairy tale monster at all. Of course, in order to dodgr his burden of proof. Can you even imagine a Christian acting in such a disdisingenuous way?
