RE: I can feel your anger
July 6, 2012 at 12:11 pm
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2012 at 12:32 pm by Taqiyya Mockingbird.)
(July 6, 2012 at 11:48 am)CliveStaples Wrote: [quote='Taqiyya Mockingbird' pid='306584' dateline='1341589562']You obviously missed the part about Stalin and Pol Pot being their own "objects of worship", whelp.
Right, a decidedly mundane and anthropic brand of worship.
[/quote]
Yes -- Very much like xtardism!
(July 6, 2012 at 12:08 pm)CliveStaples Wrote: You know, for a "man of science" and "Reason", you're really not very good at working with abstractions or drawing logical inferences. Kinda funny that you're such a fan of stuff you're so inept at.
Pot. Kettle.
(July 6, 2012 at 11:58 am)CliveStaples Wrote: [quote='Taqiyya Mockingbird' pid='306595' dateline='1341590190']
LOL what a fucking retard. And oh, by the way, Hitler wad a chistard.
chistard? Missed an "r", methinks.
Quote:Easy to do on a pod, pedantiderp.
[quote]Oh, and that chain of inferences was done using definitions of 'atheist' used by other people in the thread. So if you don't like the conclusion, blame the atheists whose reasoning justified it.
Yet another example of your preposterous and sad attempts at sophistry. Just making more of a fool of yourself.
Quote: Well, according to the definition that I've used consistently through this thread--which is entirely consistent with your own definition--all of those belief systems are atheist. None of them include the believe "At least one god exists"; none of them are theist, therefore they're all atheist.
Disingenuoys fucktsrd, because all of them contain a clause that is not necessarily atheistic. All of them are "and" statements. You should give up semantic prestidigitation. You suck at it.
Quote: Well, according to the definition that I've used consistently through this thread--which is entirely consistent with your own definition--all of those belief systems are atheist. None of them include the believe "At least one god exists"; none of them are theist, therefore they're all atheist.
Disingenuous fucktard. All of those "and" statements fail because they contain clauses that are outside of atheism. You KNOW that, and you are just being a verbose asswipe. Give up the semantic prestidigitation -- you suck at it
