I can feel your anger

[Selliedjoup]

I can state that God does not exist due to the lack of evidence. If you think there is evidence that contradicts my position let me see it and perhaps I'll review my position. I won't hold my breath.

I'm not saying that god defintiely exists, I personally don't believe in a christian god, or else I wouldn't be agnostic. That said I don't discount the possibility of it being 'correct' nor do I take an active stance in belittling those who do believe.

What evidence is required to prove a god exists? If you don't know what the evidence is, then you're in no position to assess whether it exists or not.

---

Yes but I'm only self-righteous in claiming I don't know and neither do you.

You're telling me that you don't know if god is real? Then why do you fuckers go on and on and on about a fucking entity that you don't know is real?

Why specifically come on an atheist forum and vehemently oppose atheists that also do not know if god is real?

Who is "you fuckers"? All I claim is the atheist position is as faith based as the theist one. The difference is theists have the congintive ability to recognise faith. Those atheists who attempt to portray themselves as some sort of rational/objective being need to be able to adequately justify their perspective with facts. Until then atheism will remain a belief. I can understand why that annoys you so, as you will probably never be able to disprove a god (if it doesn't exist). I guess the only thing you can do is have faith science will be able to account for existence, govnerning laws to the level required etc so a creator is surplus to requirements.

Primarily because atheists proclaim it's rational to not believe, belittle those who do, but then strangely admit they "do not know if god is real". If so many did not consider themselves to be a paragon of intellectual honesty, I wouldn't call bullshit.

---

Thats it, I'm raising the stakes:
*ziiip* *FLOP*
I think you know what they are. -.-

It's like a dick, only smaller. Ba dom poom pish.

---

The points you make are trivial and verge on irrelevant.

\
In other words, you have no defense against them. My points destroy your refusal to engage rationally.

I could respond by saying "no you get fucked" but that seems pointless to me. Obviously insults are the foundation of your rationale, and I don't see how I would engage this rationally, but each to their own.

You just seem caught up in being angry, or is this just your online persona? Bit trite and dull I'm afraid.

Argumentum Ad hominem much?

Say much much?

If you were different I wouldn't say it. If someone steals and is called a thief, then complains about being called a thief after the next time they steal, the issue lies with the thief. You may beg to differ, that is your prerogative.

---

Cite and I will correct.

What difference would it make, would you change "get fucked you cunt" to "you're a cunt get fucked"? If you made a point in the misquoting I'd address them, you didn't so I won't.