RE: I can feel your anger
July 10, 2012 at 5:52 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2012 at 6:32 pm by Taqiyya Mockingbird.)
(July 10, 2012 at 4:44 pm)Selliedjoup Wrote:(July 10, 2012 at 4:18 am)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: Pathetic dodge there, junior...
You write so many words yet say nothing.
Yet another sad attempt at a dodge. You FAIL.
Quote:Obviously you still don't get it, or are choosing not to. I'll give up.
Glad to hear it. don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.
(July 9, 2012 at 9:42 am)CliveStaples Wrote: You're not even reading what I'm writing.
First, I'm not saying that evidentialism is wrong, or that it's a bad theory of justification. I'm just asking how you guys know it's true.
Shotgun's sitting in the corner. You can see for yourself whether or not our confidence is the efficacy of evidence is misplaced.
Quote:Second, all you did was look at a particular non-evidentialist system and showed that it was stupid. Your system seemed to be, "Every proposition should be believed." Are you saying that this is the only alternative to evidentialism?
No one here has claimed to be "an evidentialist". Put your fucking straw man away.
Quote:Third, how do you know that evidentialism has worked? You believe it that it's worked, but how can you prove it (without simply assuming that it works)?
We have confidence in the efficacy of evidence because it is a tried-and-true method. Unlike your superstitions, which have an abysmal accuracy record.
Quote:This isn't facetious. I'd actually like to see the proof.
Shotgun's in the corner. It's loaded up and the safety is off. knock yourself out.
(July 10, 2012 at 4:50 pm)Selliedjoup Wrote: Fair enough. It seems that you're well on your way to materialism.
You fucking armchair philoshoper-wanna-be's and your strawman diagnoses of people's "beliefs" they don't claim make me want to hurl.
If someone doesn't outright claim "I am an x-ist", your label is outright strawmanning.