(July 14, 2012 at 5:08 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: So, you are telling me that you are basing your assertion God is just on a book from various authors from various generations that were supposedly inspired by God.
Now, ignoring the fact that theres no evidence they were inspired by God as opposed to primitive superstition and severe delusions of grandeur, why should we acknowledge what essentially amounts to God telling us he is just through various glove puppets.
We'd all like to write our own reviews after all and if what you say is to be believed, he did.
My assertion god what? You're going to have to tidy that up to make sense before I can reply.
You assert there is no evidence, but you don't make the claim so your assertion is meaningless.
God isn't the author according to what I've just written to you, but the one that inspired it.
Again you aren't addressing what I've only just told you. It's like you're talking to an imaginary friend.
Please rewrite your response and make it relevant to me if you want me to answer.
Thanks.
