(July 15, 2012 at 4:00 am)Selliedjoup Wrote: Perhaps the leprechauns, unicorns et al analogy should not be commonly asserted to show the likelihood of a god?
It's not used to show the likelihood of a god. Rather to show the similarity of the kind of reasoning it takes to disbelieve the two ludicrous claims.
Obviously people seem to miss that and take it personal.