Welsh Cake, a person telling me he has no knowledge that we have free-will or even believes we have no free-will, is not a proof to me, nor should it be, that I have no knowledge of free-will.
I making analogy with this, because, it seems to me, Atheists treat the issue of God with special pleading. They are not upset at people believing in free-will even though outside personal intuition, there is no proof. There is no proof of objective morality outside personal experience. However, when it comes to God, they are upset at believers believing.
It's a overwhelming common belief, most believers can't seem to recall when they ever didn't believe in God, yet you guys are asserting with confidence, there is no such knowledge, and that the onus is upon the believers to bring some rigorously sound argument to prove God.
Just as personal experience of a believer is not a proof against a disbeliever, the same is true of the disbelief of a disbeliever against a believer.
There is no reason to demand believers to prove their case God exists to others, and there is no reasons to demand disbelievers to prove that they don't have any reason to believe in God.
When you state things like "What is spirituality?", well believers understand what spirituality is because they experienced it. I wouldn't know how to explain it. But it seems like you are imposing your experience upon others.
Just as believers shouldn't impose their belief on God towards disbelievers, neither should disbelievers impose their disbelief. You can present arguments if you have some that go either way, but simply saying "I don't know God exists" to me is like a person telling me "I don't know if we have free-will", there is people that genuinely and sincerely believe they don't know whether they have free-will or not, yet I believe they can know if they have free-will. Now I believe the same is true of knowledge of God, but I don't have to prove that.
I making analogy with this, because, it seems to me, Atheists treat the issue of God with special pleading. They are not upset at people believing in free-will even though outside personal intuition, there is no proof. There is no proof of objective morality outside personal experience. However, when it comes to God, they are upset at believers believing.
It's a overwhelming common belief, most believers can't seem to recall when they ever didn't believe in God, yet you guys are asserting with confidence, there is no such knowledge, and that the onus is upon the believers to bring some rigorously sound argument to prove God.
Just as personal experience of a believer is not a proof against a disbeliever, the same is true of the disbelief of a disbeliever against a believer.
There is no reason to demand believers to prove their case God exists to others, and there is no reasons to demand disbelievers to prove that they don't have any reason to believe in God.
When you state things like "What is spirituality?", well believers understand what spirituality is because they experienced it. I wouldn't know how to explain it. But it seems like you are imposing your experience upon others.
Just as believers shouldn't impose their belief on God towards disbelievers, neither should disbelievers impose their disbelief. You can present arguments if you have some that go either way, but simply saying "I don't know God exists" to me is like a person telling me "I don't know if we have free-will", there is people that genuinely and sincerely believe they don't know whether they have free-will or not, yet I believe they can know if they have free-will. Now I believe the same is true of knowledge of God, but I don't have to prove that.
