Acountability, never got a good answer to this.

[Reforged]

So, you are telling me that you are basing your assertion God is just on a book from various authors from various generations that were supposedly inspired by God.
Now, ignoring the fact that theres no evidence they were inspired by God as opposed to primitive superstition and severe delusions of grandeur, why should we acknowledge what essentially amounts to God telling us he is just through various glove puppets.
We'd all like to write our own reviews after all and if what you say is to be believed, he did.

My assertion god what? You're going to have to tidy that up to make sense before I can reply.

You assert there is no evidence, but you don't make the claim so your assertion is meaningless.

God isn't the author according to what I've just written to you, but the one that inspired it.

Again you aren't addressing what I've only just told you. It's like you're talking to an imaginary friend.

Please rewrite your response and make it relevant to me if you want me to answer.

Thanks.

"So, you are telling me that you are basing your assertion God is just on a book from various authors from various generations that were supposedly inspired by God."
Which part of this was hard for you to understand?

Alright, I claim, no, outright state that you have no evidence whatsoever to back up your claim God is just. Better?

Yes, based on your statement he inspired people to write God as saying he is just.
Very modest of him, why should we believe him or his followers? What is this based on?

Yes I am. Your statements are so ridiculous they need to be repeated and clarified so people can appreciate them and laugh at them with maximum efficiency. I sincerely hope you are imaginary, an intellect as low as yours really shouldn't be possible. It wouldn't surprise me if it took the majority of your mental power to focus on breathing in and out properly.

I do hope this was relevant and simple enough for your mind to absorb. I would hate for it to go over your head like so much so often does. If you're quite done with substituting a trading of insults for debate would you care to get back to my question? As much as I enjoy ripping your rather feeble attempts of wit to pieces I would rather get a straight answer out of you if possible.

Incase you forgot my query thanks to your relatively short attention span:
Yes, based on your statement he inspired people to write God as saying he is just.
Very modest of him, why should we believe him or his followers? What is this based on?