Acountability, never got a good answer to this.

[fr0d0]

"So, you are telling me that you are basing your assertion God is just on a book from various authors from various generations that were supposedly inspired by God."
Which part of this was hard for you to understand?

Ok I assume that you mean 'basing your assertion THAT God is just', or: 'basing your assertion "God is just". Your sentance, as it stood, made no sense.

No. I'm saying that my assertion that "God is just" is based upon various authors verified to have been inspired by God and collectively claiming the truth statement.

Alright, I claim, no, outright state that you have no evidence whatsoever to back up your claim God is just. Better?

A little clearer, yes, thank you.

To be clear (again), there can be no transferable evidence. Ok, now we've got that out of the way... the evidence you dispute is what the Abrahamic faiths, including the original authors both wrote and concluded from previous writings that God is Just. Now you're disagreeing with this evidence... you can't say that it doesn't exist because it clearly does.

Yes, based on your statement he inspired people to write God as saying he is just.
Very modest of him, why should we believe him or his followers? What is this based on?

How is God being immodest there lol? He didn't make them write it. "Inspired" doesn't mean forced or coerced. See above for where it came from, and add to that what human beings have deduced to be what God is, by means of rational process.

As much as I enjoy ripping your rather feeble attempts of wit to pieces I would rather get a straight answer out of you if possible.

lol and there was me reading that you'd written simple questions only. Where is this cutting retort you refer to??

Yes, based on your statement he inspired people to write God as saying he is just.

Wow another train crash of a sentance.