RE: For good people to do bad things...
September 8, 2009 at 3:12 am
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2009 at 3:23 am by fr0d0.)
(September 7, 2009 at 10:21 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote:(September 6, 2009 at 3:03 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You don't get to define Christianity differently to Christians Evie. You admin yourself you have absolutely no understanding of it. If you did, you would understand how it isn't cherry picking at all but consistent interpretation. You would understand how it can't be an NTS fallacy when my definitions are consistent.
You Christians don't get to decide on the definition of Christianity either - there's already one - the fundamentals remain the same despite the different forms of Christianity : Belief in God of the bible, belief in Jesus, etc - you get to decide a definition, what is important to you, but when you say that I don't know what Christianity 'is', then you're replacing the definition of Christianity - the fundamentals - with your own personal definition: A definition of Christianity, implying that I don't understand Christianity because it's not the way you see it, which is the NTS fallacy.
No I allude to the base Christian definition agreed upon by all Christians, as I always do. Your definition of Christianity is simply incorrect. As you exhibit no knowledge of the basic Christian stance: I call ignorance, I feel quite justly.
Let me demonstrate your reasoning:
1. The Devil is not a Christian
2. According to you, Christianity is: quote: "belief in God and Christ"
3. The Devil believes in God and Christ
4. The Devil is a Christian
Your claim that I'm speaking from a denominational stance is incorrect, which you would know if you had any understanding of Christianity. All this is quite incredible given your major interest in debunking it, don't you think?
