Acountability, never got a good answer to this.

[Reforged]

Le sigh. Unlike with yourself raff, the thoughts compiled in the bible present a rational conclusion of Gods attributes. Yet again, and this is getting tiresome, you ignore a part of the words you reply to. There can be no empirical evidence <--- in case you missed it. You refuse to use your brain. That's fine. Personally I'm glad humankind has this capacity and I don't exclude such endeavour from my consideration. I wish you all the best in your journey.

LMAO I'm sorry? What? So flooding the world, talking through a burning bush, sending two angels to be threatened with rape, raze an entire city and turn some poor bastards wife to salt, sending his son to be tortured and murdered, having every first born child in Egypt killed, (this is off the top of my head by the way, there is plenty more) letting Moses kill every heretic at the bottom of the mountain after the ten commandments, letting that priest have his concubine raped and murdered in place of him, instructing the binding of isaac before revealing it was a practical joke, letting Abrahams two daughters bare his children, the prompting for the systematic murder, torture and plunder of other religions and civilizations, the stoning of unruly children, the stoning of women who dared to have relations outside of wedlock and all the other messed up shit in the Bible ALL of which supposedly happened with Gods consent and his full knowledge of all events past, present and future.
Thats all rational, thats all ok, thats all alright. You are perfectly at peace with saying God is just when reading such damning "evidence" presented by *his* advocates.

No sir, I ignore nothing. It is you who seem to ignore a damn site more than most people I have ever met. Empirical evidence is not the only kind of evidence and that is something you seem to overlook. You're not just failing to present empirical evidence, you're failing to provide *any* kind of evidence other than the writings, of the writings, of the writings of superstitious, ignorant peasants who themselves never attempted to preserve any solid evidence which most people would consider unusual.
Not only have you not any evidence God is just but even if we were to accept the nonsense you are presenting we would have no alternative but to come to the opposite conclusion based on it. That he is *not* moral, that he is *not* loving and assuming he is even real; he is certainly *not* just.

With that you have not a leg to stand on and with that I have nothing further to add... :-)