RE: Acountability, never got a good answer to this.
July 21, 2012 at 4:56 am
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2012 at 6:40 am by Reforged.)
(July 21, 2012 at 4:50 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Ok let me explain it in single syllables for you. Go to google, put in the bible passage you'd like to see the correct interpretation of. Usually you put it in as it's written. ie John 3:16
Look at the results from biblegateway and bible.cc
You will see concordances (that's standard interpretations off all of the verses in the bible, bar none), which will explain the accepted meanings.
Don't expect me to do that very basic leg work for you. It's pointless. If you have questions after seeing the standard answer, then ask away. Rest assured, my initial answer will be the same as the one presented there.
Understanding the bible as a whole and in perspective, if you're interested in doing that, requires an equal amout of study as you want to get out of it. To get you started on the first part of the bible, and from an unbiased perspective, I'd recommend John H. Walton "The Lost world of Genesis One".
It appears that you have already retreated from my question to you, which you have consistentloy done to every question I've asked you. Seems hypocrysy is strong with you.
Not gonna wash fr0d0. You know theres many, many interpretations of the Bible out there all radically different. I want what you consider to be the "accepted interpretation". You're not going to sidetrack me with your usual bullshit.
Will you stop running away, be a man and answer the questions:
"What is this accepted interpretation of the Bible passages that talks about Lots daughters getting him drunk specifically to get pregnant? What is the accepted interpretation of the priest and the concubine?"
It is within your power to answer these questions, so answer them. Or retreat.
Your choice.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.
