Acountability, never got a good answer to this.

[Reforged]

Not gonna wash fr0d0. You know theres many, many interpretations of the Bible out there all radically different. I want what you consider to be the "accepted interpretation".

Yet the evidence right there in front of you says the opposite.

I've given you source. Please show me where that source contradicts itself and we have a game.

I want *your* answer, I want *your* interpretation which you consider to be the correct one. You claim to have this information at your disposal so there should be nothing holding you back. Give me the enlightening explanation that could only be given by someone who has engaged in the intense study you spoke of, I assume you've engaged in it otherwise you'd have no business attempting to lecture me on it. Frank Turek didn't get to post websites to Christopher Hitchens and leave him to read through all of them mid-debate for the answer Turek most approved of. Why the hell should you? Do I look like your secretary? If you are truly incapable of an answer of your own you should know how to copy and paste the answer you most approve of.

"What is this accepted interpretation of the Bible passages that talks about Lots daughters getting him drunk specifically to get pregnant? What is the accepted interpretation of the priest and the concubine?"
Once again, answer the questions or retreat fr0d0.

---

This is looking more and more like a retreat fr0d0... or a desperate search through wikipedia.
It was Lots daughters by the way. Not Abrahams. Lot is son of Abraham, easy but slightly embarrassing mistake which I should of picked up on. The point still stands though. Rather surprised you didn't notice it really but then I suspect most of your knowledge of the Bible comes from what you've been told and the internet.
Are you going to answer the question by the way? Or have you admitted defeat?