Acountability, never got a good answer to this.

[liam]

From someone with reading difficulties such as yourself I take all of that as you fantasizing again.

FYI I'm really not going to answer you this time. Let me explain why.
1. You didn't acknowledge my answer last time. So this childish tirade won't end here.
2. You keep on with the mindless badgering despite me telling you I had no time to respond yesterday.
3. Your questions are so infantile that they don't warrant an answer.
4. All of your questions already got answered yet you still ask like they weren't.

Now carry on regardless.

Let me strip this bullshit down a little just to make things go a little more efficiently

1- fair play, all discussion should take into account all points raised wherever possible, yet having second-hand opinions is only good when you can actually expand on them and aren't trying to gain boo-hoorahs by pasting other people's opinions, stop being a pretentious wanker.
2- that's normal, its called skepticism and it's generally useful for sifting the wheat from the chaff in life.
3- question dodging, stop being a pussy, if your argument doesn't stand up to scrutiny and you can't answer questions then amend it or admit defeat
4- agree with Raphiel, don't moan about your questions not being answered then bitch about questions being asked. Admittedly there should be responses but you'll have to accept that people can't always respond to everything, other stuff is going on in the world.

Personally I'd advise avoiding the Ad-Homs because that's a pussy move to cover for a bad argument and just generally a dick thing to do

I suppose my main points are (1)- whenever possible all points should be considered regardless of how you perceive their value, and (2)- If you've no personal response there is very little point citing others, that's simply avoidance