Quote:I'm not prosposing a method, how many times do you need me to say that for it to sink in? Although it's the best method humanity has this does not grant it powers beyond its scope. Why do you think it does?Quote me where I said it did? The scientific method works with the natural. Never stated it worked with anything like the supernatural.
Quote:Why you think scinece's roles in computer, food etc contributes towards answering the god question is up to you to rationalise.Just stating that science is in everything. Thing is, claiming god created the universe is a scientific claim.
Quote:I agree, I shall believe whatever I want, as much as you do. Just try not to portray your position as without belief, we all make choices in choosing what we believe to be of relevance, you are no different.Sorry to disappoint you but I am without belief. Like it or sod off.
Quote:"If you have a better method than the scientific method, please share."Wrong quote. Try again.
Quote:I'm asking why you consider yourself capable of assessing the evidence, or why you assume the evidence must be obtainable?If god created the universe, it should leave evidence. If god is supernatural, non-material, then there's no way to verify the claim and so it'll lack any value.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
