RE: I can feel your anger
July 24, 2012 at 4:35 am
(This post was last modified: July 24, 2012 at 4:42 am by Selliedjoup.)
(July 24, 2012 at 4:06 am)Ace Otana Wrote:Quote:I'm not prosposing a method, how many times do you need me to say that for it to sink in? Although it's the best method humanity has this does not grant it powers beyond its scope. Why do you think it does?Quote:Quote me where I said it did? The scientific method works with the natural. Never stated it worked with anything like the supernatural.
Once again"If you have a better method than the scientific method, please share."
So if there is no better method than the scientific method, yet it never worked with anything like the 'supernatural' how could it assess the 'supernatural'. Note you claim natural is what science can prove, and imply anything unprovable is 'supernatural' which has the connotation of not being credible.
Quote:Why you think scinece's roles in computer, food etc contributes towards answering the god question is up to you to rationalise.Just stating that science is in everything. Thing is, claiming god created the universe is a scientific claim.
Quote:I agree, I shall believe whatever I want, as much as you do. Just try not to portray your position as without belief, we all make choices in choosing what we believe to be of relevance, you are no different.Sorry to disappoint you but I am without belief. Like it or sod off.
Looks like I'll have to sod off, that said I'll stay if you can prove that science can prove or disprove a god, otherwise you'll just have to stick with the belief tag.
Quote:"If you have a better method than the scientific method, please share."Wrong quote. Try again.
I asked why must science be able to assess the existence of a god, and you responded with science being the best method.
The best method to answer the question does not equate to must being able to answer it. So why do you look to scientific evidence at all?
Quote:I'm asking why you consider yourself capable of assessing the evidence, or why you assume the evidence must be obtainable?Quote:If god created the universe, it should leave evidence. If god is supernatural, non-material, then there's no way to verify the claim and so it'll lack any value.
What evidence are you looking for? fingerprints, dna?
(July 24, 2012 at 4:28 am)cato123 Wrote: [quote='Selliedjoup' pid='314803' dateline='1343117895']
I'm bold in the challenge as I and atheists don't know, yet atheists present their opinion a scientific, despite their belief that science can address the question.
It's only the ultimate as I'm right. But you're right with regard to the troll's delight.
Is it just me? Or did Selliedjoup just go totally Yoda in communication style?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQ4yd2W50...re=related
(July 24, 2012 at 4:13 am)cato123 Wrote:(July 24, 2012 at 4:06 am)Selliedjoup Wrote:
Yo?!? You fucking disect every reply in order to remove context; however, you seem to be ducking me. Why?
I'm scared.
