(July 22, 2012 at 4:39 pm)liam Wrote:(July 22, 2012 at 8:40 am)fr0d0 Wrote: From someone with reading difficulties such as yourself I take all of that as you fantasizing again.
FYI I'm really not going to answer you this time. Let me explain why.
1. You didn't acknowledge my answer last time. So this childish tirade won't end here.
2. You keep on with the mindless badgering despite me telling you I had no time to respond yesterday.
3. Your questions are so infantile that they don't warrant an answer.
4. All of your questions already got answered yet you still ask like they weren't.
Now carry on regardless.
.
Let me strip this bullshit down a little just to make things go a little more efficiently
1- fair play, all discussion should take into account all points raised wherever possible, yet having second-hand opinions is only good when you can actually expand on them and aren't trying to gain boo-hoorahs by pasting other people's opinions, stop being a pretentious wanker.
2- that's normal, its called skepticism and it's generally useful for sifting the wheat from the chaff in life.
3- question dodging, stop being a pussy, if your argument doesn't stand up to scrutiny and you can't answer questions then amend it or admit defeat
4- agree with Raphiel, don't moan about your questions not being answered then bitch about questions being asked. Admittedly there should be responses but you'll have to accept that people can't always respond to everything, other stuff is going on in the world.
Personally I'd advise avoiding the Ad-Homs because that's a pussy move to cover for a bad argument and just generally a dick thing to do
I suppose my main points are (1)- whenever possible all points should be considered regardless of how you perceive their value, and (2)- If you've no personal response there is very little point citing others, that's simply avoidance
I could care less about Ad Homins, I blaspheme both claims and individuals myself so I really could give a shit less if a theists does the same to me. What is more important to me is the argument someone makes.
You could look at "ad homins" much like the NFL fans behind the goal posts trying to distract the kicker from making the field goal. I think if you are a good kicker, those fans won't make you choke.
If someone wants to call me a dick, or equate me to Hitler merely because I don't believe, I could give a shit less about that. Let em do it. It still wouldn't change that they don't have one lick of evidence for such a claim.
I really am not much for arguing against offending people, them or us. Our species has always found something to bitch about and we all do it. To think anyone should be free from being offended is absurd on a planet of 7 billion.
