RE: This is What Global Warming Looks Like
July 26, 2012 at 11:16 am
(This post was last modified: July 26, 2012 at 11:18 am by Ace Otana.)
(July 26, 2012 at 11:13 am)Rhythm Wrote: I've watched it, I find it less compelling than you do, for the reasons stated in my post. Those who champion population control (either explicitly or implicitly) do so by assuming that a whole laundry list of other conditions are met. Well, why not meet those conditions first and then take a look at population control? Doesn't that seem reasonable?
I don't agree on population control (as in telling people how many kids they can have), merely warning of the damage being done. When populations grow, you have to produce additional food supply, water, space and it all comes out of the environment. Finite planet, finite resources. We harm the environment for the benefit of the population. Damage increases with the population.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
