(July 26, 2012 at 11:21 am)Rhythm Wrote: We already produce more food than is necessary to feed our population. Production is not the issue Ace, distribution is.
Kinda true, the richer nations are better fed. However, Britain for example, cannot sustain itself food wise. Too many people to feed. If you took away trade, many of us would starve.
Even if food isn't a problem, fresh water is. Reservoirs are drying up all over. Land, we need lots of it for housing and jobs. Where will it come from? Green belts, the wildlife.
You cannot have an infinite population on a finite planet. I was taught that back in high school through simulations.
Was you taught about the rabbits and the foxes? Too many rabbits, no foxes and the resources will be used up, they die. Too many foxes and they die.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
