The justification would be the recognition of the ability to decipher it either way. Belief, dogma, dominant paradigms etc prove nothing. I find the distinct 'brand' of new atheism to assign itself knowledge beyond its sphere.
I understand you claiming agnosticism and atheism are not mutually exclusive. To me they are, as what I believe to be true is based on my knowledge.
Materialism and naturalism are very odd positions to assert if you don't know them to be true.
I understand you claiming agnosticism and atheism are not mutually exclusive. To me they are, as what I believe to be true is based on my knowledge.
Materialism and naturalism are very odd positions to assert if you don't know them to be true.