(July 30, 2012 at 11:56 pm)Shell B Wrote: That's not censorship, you dipshit. I have freedom of speech. You have freedom of speech. However, neither of us has the freedom to use someone else's words without their permission. Intellectual property law =/= censorship.
...uh, not every quotation needs to have permission. If you, say, admit to a crime, I can report that to the cops. It doesn't seem like you know the extent of intellectual property law (or privacy law, which might be applicable). Have you heard of the fair use doctrine?
Quote:You said you vote based on a person's religious views. If I, an atheist, ran against Hitler, a Christian, you would thus vote for Hitler, unless of course you like to get naughty and vote against your religious views. Either way, it is a weak move that likely lacks observation and deduction. I mean, why bother, if you only need to know one thing about your candidate?
Just because you vote based on a single issue doesn't mean you lack observation and deduction. Perhaps after much observation and deduction, you've concluded that the best criteria to use is actually a single one.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
