RE: Assault On Free Speech
July 31, 2012 at 4:42 pm
(This post was last modified: July 31, 2012 at 4:45 pm by CliveStaples.)
(July 31, 2012 at 11:40 am)Moros Synackaon Wrote: It is used to show off the hateful bias that Christians and others will vote solely based on religion and not on policies.
So if you disqualify someone based solely on their religion, that's "hateful bias"? Do you really think the theists here are more hatefully biased against atheists than the atheists are against the theists?
(July 31, 2012 at 11:45 am)Moros Synackaon Wrote: If you bothered to read her post, you'll see that she specified no condition that would mean all, none or some of what the topic was. In this case, it is `words' (as corresponding to what an author may write) and as such, you'll notice she did not specify the length of a potential length of text that would constitute infringement.
She intentionally left that underspecified.
And actually, depending on the length and usage of what you're quoting/using/etc, you can easily transition from fair use into infringement.
...? I never said that she had specified the length of a potential length of text that would constitute infringement.
She said:
Quote:Screen cap it all you want. If I ever seen it anywhere that doesn't fall under fair use, I'll DMCA you for the fucking fun of it.
This seems like an attempt to intimidate someone into not using material under Fair Use from fear of being prosecuted. So of course she left it open-ended; that's the point of a threat.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
