(July 31, 2012 at 6:01 pm)Shell B Wrote: Um, my initial post actually spoke quite clearly of illegitimate uses. I believe I said, "if it doesn't fall under fair use." Why are you having so much trouble keeping up?
If you read my post, you'd know that I argued that your statement was really just a threat designed to curtail legitimate fair-use of your speech. If I say, "I'm gonna be incredibly litigious if you go over the line at all," then the person is probably going to steer clear of the line. And that's what I think your threat was designed to do: curtail fair usage of your speech.
Quote:It was never my intent to convince anyone that I am not an asshole. I am an asshole. I'm an asshole trying to explain something simple to a dipshit with an agenda. That's not going to bring out my unasshole side, if ever I had such a thing.
It seems like you're an asshole who uses the threat of litigation to curtail protected speech.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
