(July 31, 2012 at 6:04 pm)CliveStaples Wrote: If you read my post, you'd know that I argued that your statement was really just a threat designed to curtail legitimate fair-use of your speech.
Overzealous inference.
Quote:If I say, "I'm gonna be incredibly litigious if you go over the line at all," then the person is probably going to steer clear of the line. And that's what I think your threat was designed to do: curtail fair usage of your speech.
A DMCA takedown is not incredibly litigious. It takes five minutes to handle and five minutes to abide by.
Quote:It seems like you're an asshole who uses the threat of litigation to curtail protected speech.
Anything over fair use is not protected speech. I have to deal with asshats like you all the time who think freedom of speech means freedom to steal the words of others. It means you can use your own words, not mine. I could give a shriveled up pair of monkey's balls what you think of my personality. It has no bearing whatsoever on our disagreement. However, if you want to go that road, you sound like a hopped up dickhead who is arguing the right to plagiarize others.
