(July 31, 2012 at 4:52 pm)CliveStaples Wrote: Oh, you might know the definition. You certainly don't respect the reason for having a "fair use" exception, otherwise you won't issue speech-chilling threats--butapparently, you have to "deal with" fair use on a regular basis. Should I assume your jackboot-on-the-neck approach here is typical? Not really a fan of free speech, eh?
Although I probably shouldn't challenge you, because you might direct your ire at me--and who knows what resources you have at your disposal? I don't really feel like being SWATed.
Come on CS. Give her a break.
(words are how she makes her living) LOL.
If she wants to sue ppl - for the fun of it she said - then she can.
But I'm gonna chain link and quote those sexist epithets like confetti
