RE: Evolution/creation 2
August 9, 2012 at 12:06 pm
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2012 at 12:09 pm by Drich.)
(August 9, 2012 at 11:51 am)catfish Wrote:(August 9, 2012 at 11:42 am)Drich Wrote: Again how does this not make Adam and Eve the 1st?
re·plen·ish (r-plnsh) KEY
VERB:
re·plen·ished, re·plen·ish·ing, re·plen·ish·es
VERB:
tr.
To fill or make complete again; add a new stock or supply to: replenish the larder.
To inspire or nourish: The music will replenish my weary soul.
VERB:
intr.
To become full again.
Do you seriously not know what replenish means?
God made Them Both Male and Female. "Them" being Adam and Eve. Their Job was to replenish. So Again tell me how that does not make Adam and Eve/"Them" the first to be created?
(August 9, 2012 at 11:11 am)RaphielDrake Wrote:(August 9, 2012 at 9:28 am)Drich Wrote: Again the theology stops @ the fact there is not a time line between creation and the fall. as far as introducing 'evolution' into the mix i have only said this is just plausiable now (where it was not before) like a 100 times now.
That means I spoke where the bible spoke and remained silent where the bible was silent
It would be plausible if creationism had any evidence behind it and didn't claim an invisible, all-powerful being made the universe appear without breaking a sweat then decided he would have to make Adam out of dust as opposed to making him simply appear.
Then decided to break off Adams rib and make Eve out of it.
According to Creationism these were the first human beings.
Oh and then a snake talked to Eve to convince her to eat an apple.
At which point God was pretty pissed off they'd eaten "The Fruit of Forbidden Knowledge". Not particularly sure why he put it out for them. He knows everything after all, he must of known this would happen but thats another dicussion.
Anyway, they got cast down to earth as a result.
Thats the creationists theory.
There is no proof behind it and it sounds like something a child would come up with.
Unless you can prove it you have no cause to assume its true and definitely no cause to attempt to mix it with far more plausible theories.
Theres no reason the story of Apocalypse Now! couldn't of taken place during the Vietnam War... except someone took it from the experiences of a man called Conrad and theres no evidence any such events ever took place during that time frame or even in that country.
The Vietnam War did though, we can prove it did... just incase anyones wondering.
Your wanting to argue your faith here and why it is you do not see creation as a viable alternitive to what you believe now. I will not argue your faith for the sake of doing so. You have the right to believe what you want. For God gave you this life to make a desision, and you have. Far be it from me to tell you, that you made the wrong one.