(August 21, 2012 at 5:41 pm)elunico13 Wrote: This is where the "IF" comes in concerning the rights of others. "IF" justifies your support of a woman killing her baby which is a part of her. Ok got it.
This is how you answered me concerning rights being imprtant.
Rights are the social recognition of your identity as a human being.
It is the sanction given as a result of acceptance of your capacity for autonomy and rationality.
Who are you trying to force to recognize others socially by rights?
Where do you get this?
Who is obligated to accept anyone's autonomy and rationality in a world that was formed by random mutations with no intelligence behind the forming of life?
Your foundation for all this is everything created itself. Rational? No. scientifically impossible.
About 65% of all fertilized eggs do not implant or are ejected after implantation. They are human beings..right?
Looks like 'God' is responsible for the vast majority of abortions. That baby murderer...
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
