Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 3, 2025, 8:05 am

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Feedback on discussion
#6
RE: Feedback on discussion
It's all based on that Big Book of Multiple Choice they insist on defending against all reason and at any cost. No matter what facts you can pick out to make or refute a point, they can pull out some other bits that appear to counter them (whether they actually do or not). That plus they get to quote anything they like out of context but we need to quote the whole damn thing from cover to cover. Basically, the whole mess is so completely and absurdly contradictory anyone can get it to say and justify anything they like - which ought to be a point in our favour, since any genuinely Holy Writ (as opposed to Atrociously Writ) ought to be clear, unambiguousand not have to rely on human languages which evolve and die out. As Matt Dillahunty has said, any god that wanted to give its Special Creations (ie us) some eternally truthful message would hardwire it into our brains.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Feedback on discussion - by FallentoReason - August 22, 2012 at 10:49 am
RE: Feedback on discussion - by The Grand Nudger - August 22, 2012 at 12:02 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Faith No More - August 22, 2012 at 2:15 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by FallentoReason - August 22, 2012 at 8:03 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Lion IRC - August 23, 2012 at 2:32 am
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Minimalist - August 22, 2012 at 8:16 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Cyberman - August 22, 2012 at 8:29 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by catfish - August 22, 2012 at 10:57 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Cato - August 23, 2012 at 1:27 am
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Cyberman - August 22, 2012 at 11:09 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by catfish - August 24, 2012 at 8:57 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Cyberman - August 24, 2012 at 9:04 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by catfish - August 24, 2012 at 9:10 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Cato - August 25, 2012 at 12:57 am
RE: Feedback on discussion - by catfish - August 25, 2012 at 5:31 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Cyberman - August 23, 2012 at 9:44 am
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Drich - August 23, 2012 at 1:41 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by FallentoReason - August 27, 2012 at 9:30 am
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Drich - September 3, 2012 at 12:00 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by CaseyTheAthie - September 3, 2012 at 12:22 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Drich - September 3, 2012 at 9:16 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by CaseyTheAthie - September 3, 2012 at 10:06 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Cyberman - August 24, 2012 at 9:15 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by MysticKnight - August 24, 2012 at 9:24 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by catfish - August 24, 2012 at 9:24 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by FallentoReason - September 3, 2012 at 9:22 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by Drich - September 3, 2012 at 11:33 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by The Grand Nudger - September 3, 2012 at 11:43 pm
RE: Feedback on discussion - by FallentoReason - September 4, 2012 at 12:03 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Reply to a Discussion Glitch 8 2558 June 28, 2013 at 7:24 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  A discussion with tack Zenith 29 10015 July 10, 2011 at 12:28 pm
Last Post: reverendjeremiah
  A discussion around family table. Rwandrall 129 82177 May 27, 2010 at 5:40 pm
Last Post: Scented Nectar



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)