RE: What should replace Pascal's wager in my opinion.
August 28, 2012 at 4:55 pm
(This post was last modified: August 28, 2012 at 5:14 pm by Ace Otana.)
(August 28, 2012 at 4:49 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I thought most of you were Agnostic Soft Atheists.Agnostic atheist means I don't know/cannot know for certain that god exists or not while atheist seeing as I don't believe there is a god.
I'm 9999.9% sure there is no such thing as a god.
Quote:so on what basis do you dismiss them?.No evidence, no value, no credibility, no explanatory power what so ever. The usual.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.