Charity is a a false solution to any problem.
To really allocate money to have actual effect you need government intervention.
I am against charity myself for just this reason, it removes the urgency for government action and so nothing lasting is achieved.
There are also so many charities trying to do the same thing it is a wasteful and inefficient use of money.
During the Victorian era you had many benefactors giving generously for specific causes, all very laudable, but no matter how generous and wealthy a person or group of people is they cannot match the power of a properly directed government initiative.
Until the government stepped in legislatively or financially nothing ever changed.
To really allocate money to have actual effect you need government intervention.
I am against charity myself for just this reason, it removes the urgency for government action and so nothing lasting is achieved.
There are also so many charities trying to do the same thing it is a wasteful and inefficient use of money.
During the Victorian era you had many benefactors giving generously for specific causes, all very laudable, but no matter how generous and wealthy a person or group of people is they cannot match the power of a properly directed government initiative.
Until the government stepped in legislatively or financially nothing ever changed.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
