Why Secular Morality is Superior

[elunico13]

You can't violate without having a freedom to choose.

Good thing we do have that freedom.

Baking soda doesn't choose to react with vinegar.

Good thing we are neither.

That's called chemistry, which is what you believe you are.

No we don't. Don't try to tell us what we believe.

The will of another is unimportant in an evolution worldview.

No, it's not.

No one is under your arbitrary "social contract" and obligated to obey whatever you say.

If they are a part of society, then yes, they are.

No pain no gain, right?

Wrong.

Why would you love random mutations from pond scum?

No one here loves you.

Any other society can arbitrarily assert the opposite.

Which is why we don't let fundies have that kind of power.

There aren't any rational objections here. They're all arbitrary. Kind of like the other thread. I see more emotional responses from you than anything. Why do you get like this if truth is "on your side"?

---

Yes we are taught by our parents when we our younger , but by wider society also as we get older. It's a bit like i said earlier about a pack Wolves punishing misdermeanors with a snarl , or a bite. They teach eachother by enforcing the code like we do , but do they teach eachother to bring a sick or injured pack member a lump of meat? And for that matter , can we actually learn to selflessly do good for a fellow human being , with no perceivable benefit other then the expected gratitude ?
I think mainly not , but i can see a Dawinian advantage to it.

So our parents and then society determine what is moral? Did I understand you correctly?