RE: Formulating a rational defense of skepticism (a work in progress)
September 4, 2012 at 3:09 pm
The fact that you imagine I'm expecting anything out of skepticism itself shows you to be misguided.
All I'm saying is, if you don't have any rational boundaries to skepticism, if you don't have any rational reason not to ask the question "Why should I believe skepticism is good?", then your skepticism is irrational.
And it seems that you don't have such a reason, meaning your skepticism is irrational.
Just sayin, brah!
All I'm saying is, if you don't have any rational boundaries to skepticism, if you don't have any rational reason not to ask the question "Why should I believe skepticism is good?", then your skepticism is irrational.
And it seems that you don't have such a reason, meaning your skepticism is irrational.
Just sayin, brah!