(September 5, 2012 at 12:02 am)Brunitski Wrote:(September 4, 2012 at 1:22 pm)elunico13 Wrote: Serial killers excert the exact opposite.
I guess you're fine with pedofilia too. Don't wanna be intolerant, right? lol
Sorry, did you just call whateverist a paedophile? Or as you so eloquently put it "pedofilia" How do you fail so hard when there is a spell checker built in? And aren't you one of those who believe in some fat bastard in a dress watching everything you do?
What is he going to make of such a pathetic ad hom in his name?
(September 4, 2012 at 1:22 pm)elunico13 Wrote: Then I guess you wouldn't seek justice for the violent murder of a next of kin. After all the killer can adopt his relative morality of murder if he wants to. You're not going to say that he's wrong are you lol?wtf?? Are you talking about law, or Morality? Do you even know the difference? Are you going to address any points brought up by anyone anytime soon? What fucking evolution world view?
You're actually consistant with the evoltution worldview if you believe this. Congratulations!
Answer this: Is Morality subjective or absolute?
B
You're not mad at me are you?
Absuloot
James Holmes acted consistent with what evolution teaches. He evolved from an animal, and when he murdered those people, He acted like one. You can't say he's wrong since evolution made him that way.
