The nature of number
September 5, 2012 at 5:47 am
(This post was last modified: September 5, 2012 at 5:49 am by Categories+Sheaves.)
(September 3, 2012 at 7:20 pm)jonb Wrote: Quick thought though, what if individual numbers do not have integrity of themselves, but are only created from the series by the observation. Is that a possible line of enquiry?I mean, what do we count "observation" as? There's a very old discussion about whether the mathematical structures we play with exist in their own right, or just through our intuition/visualization/understanding. Finitism/Ultrafinitism is also a thing; if I prove that some formula works when I plug in '1', and then (abstractly) prove "if the formula works for some integer n, then the formula must work for n+1 as well" I've proven this formula for all natural numbers, right? It's common practice in math to say "yes, of course!" but some folks aren't so sure (e.g. Ed Nelson from Princeton tried to prove that the Peano Axioms weren't consistent about a year ago). It's not like I'll ever "observe" all the integers out there (given a finite brain and a finite lifespan, anyway) so how can I intelligently make statements about all the integers? The phenomenology of math is pretty weird.