(September 7, 2012 at 8:53 am)elunico13 Wrote: Then don't condemn the rapist and child molester if that's the life they choose to live.
Wrong. They should be condemned because the life they choose to live is preventing others from living the life of their choice.
(September 7, 2012 at 8:53 am)elunico13 Wrote: And what obligation do they have to follow an an immaterial "urge" in a materialistic universe?
The obligation imposed by the fact that they choose to be a part of the society.
(September 7, 2012 at 8:53 am)elunico13 Wrote: Wrong. Many non christians believe the NT is divinely inspired also.
Like who?
(September 7, 2012 at 8:53 am)elunico13 Wrote: You're judging the behavior of another without a standard to do so.
A judgment without standard would be impossible.
(September 7, 2012 at 8:53 am)elunico13 Wrote: If you assert your own its only arbitrary.
You keep using that word....
(September 7, 2012 at 8:53 am)elunico13 Wrote: Man has no authority for setting moral standards.
Why not?
(September 7, 2012 at 8:53 am)elunico13 Wrote: Only your creator.
Why?
(September 7, 2012 at 8:53 am)elunico13 Wrote: Did you use your brain to come up with this conclusion? See the problem?
You use your brain to make these judgments and you've done nothing to show that your brain is fully developed to arrive at any valid conclusion.
I just see the fallacy of begging the question.
Well, maybe your brain isn't, but the rest of us.....
The fact that the conclusions we come to actually work in the real world means that we are capable of arriving at valid conclusions.
