(September 7, 2012 at 8:53 am)elunico13 Wrote: Did you use your brain to come up with this conclusion? See the problem?
You use your brain to make these judgments and you've done nothing to show that your brain is fully developed to arrive at any valid conclusion.
I just see the fallacy of begging the question.
There's so much stupid in these posts, I have trouble keeping up with all of it.
OK, so are we going full blown solipsism here? You can't be sure of anything so why bother?
If you're doubting whether or not your brain is reliable, how are you relying on your faith in your god, which you learned and can more-or-less process via your brain? Not only does this not get you to higher ground, logically, but you have more complications to account for than I do. I must account for why I feel my brain is accurately assessing reality (which, as Genkaus has pointed out, I see no reason to doubt my sanity). You must account for that and why you feel you both have heard the correct religion and have understood it correctly, through the very same brain you claim I can't rely on.
Ah, the stupid, it burns.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist