Why Secular Morality is Superior

[genkaus]

You know what, I've changed my mind and now am convinced that the biblical creation story is the real deal. Only the biblical god could have produced something this moronic. Evolution would never have allowed such stupidity to survive.

The atheist is inconsistent when he/she doesn't randomly kill anyone they don't like.

Only if random killing is a part of his morality.

James Holmes was consistent with the premises of evolution in colorado and arrived at a valid conclusion based on the logic of evolution. Not a sound conclusion though.

That's surprising. Since he wasn't an atheist.

Atheists are consistent when supporting abortions or killing unconscience people dependent on others. (genkaus' standard)

Half-right. Unconscious people aren't actually dependent on others. Therefore, there is no reason to support killing them. Unborn babies on the other hand - go right ahead.

They are inconsistent when they consider the feelings of others.

Only if being inconsiderate is a part of their morality.

All I get are arbitrary answers that vary between atheists on this forum.

That should tell you something - not all atheists follow the same philosophy.

I guess we should follow the standard of whoever has the coolest screen name. right?

No, the one that is most rational. But then, I wouldn't expect you to do that, since you aren't capable of it.