C1 does not logically follow from P1. As written, C1 is a bare assertion. It seems you may be thinking that the second clause of P1 is self-evident - if that's the case, then you're basically affirming the consequent.
The first part of your argument is invalid. As the latter part is dependent on the first, I haven't bothered with it.
In addition P1 is so awkwardly worded that I would scrap it and start over.
The first part of your argument is invalid. As the latter part is dependent on the first, I haven't bothered with it.
In addition P1 is so awkwardly worded that I would scrap it and start over.