Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 1:16 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Consciousness Trilemma
#1
Consciousness Trilemma
(*Hat-tip Maverick Philosopher, here)

It appears that of the following three propositions only two can be true:

1) Conscious experience is not an illusion.
2) Conscious experience has an essentially subjective character that purely physical processes do not share.
3) The only acceptable explanation of conscious experience is in terms of physical properties alone.

I must hand it to Maverick Philosopher because this trilemma so neatly identifies and clarifies the dominant positions with respect to philosophy of mind. Like him, I am inclined to accept 1) and 2) which entails that I must reject 3). I have some inkling of where other AF members would place their bets but it would be nice to let people weight in and see where the discussion leads.
Reply
#2
RE: Consciousness Trilemma
Can an AI have a conscious experience?
If yes, then it is possible to encode such a thing in terms of purely physical properties.

If it is possible, what is the difficulty in accepting that Nature has taken such a path?

It certainly beats the alternative of supposing that there are virtually infinite incorporeal consciousnesses out there, just waiting for a host to materialize.... or that they are created at the same time as the host, by some undefined, unknown and unmeasurable method.
Reply
#3
RE: Consciousness Trilemma
(May 23, 2017 at 6:25 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: (*Hat-tip Maverick Philosopher, here)

It appears that of the following three propositions only two can be true:

1) Conscious experience is not an illusion.
2) Conscious experience has an essentially subjective character that purely physical processes do not share.
3) The only acceptable explanation of conscious experience is in terms of physical properties alone.

I must hand it to Maverick Philosopher because this trilemma so neatly identifies and clarifies the dominant positions with respect to philosophy of mind. Like him, I am inclined to accept 1) and 2) which entails that I must reject 3). I have some inkling of where other AF members would place their bets but it would be nice to let people weight in and see where the discussion leads.

From your link:

Quote:Welcome to the third and latest incarnation of Maverick Philosopher.
I began began this weblog in May of 2004...

Is this going to be a long introduction?


Quote:A lot of what I write here is unpolished and tentative.  I explore the cartography of ideas along many paths.  Here below we are in statu viae, and it is fitting that our thinking should be exploratory, meandering, and undogmatic.  Nothing human, and thus nothing philosophical, is foreign to me.
Makes perfect sense.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
Reply
#4
RE: Consciousness Trilemma
(May 23, 2017 at 6:40 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Can an AI have a conscious experience?
If yes, then it is possible to encode such a thing in terms of purely physical properties.

If it is possible, what is the difficulty in accepting that Nature has taken such a path?

It certainly beats the alternative of supposing that there are virtually infinite incorporeal consciousnesses out there, just waiting for a host to materialize.... or that they are created at the same time as the host, by some undefined, unknown and unmeasurable method.

Poca, what if an advanced AI can emulate consciousness perfectly without actually experiencing it?
Does that count? How is the experience different from the decisions made if the end result is identical?
The actual experience of consciousness may not be that important?
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#5
RE: Consciousness Trilemma
(May 23, 2017 at 6:25 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: It appears that of the following three propositions only two can be true:

1) Conscious experience is not an illusion.

In this context, how would you call conscious experience an illusion?  Usually an illusion IS an experience-- of a physical object or property that is not there, or is there in a form radically different than you perceive it.
Reply
#6
RE: Consciousness Trilemma
(May 23, 2017 at 6:25 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: (*Hat-tip Maverick Philosopher, here)

It appears that of the following three propositions only two can be true:

1) Conscious experience is not an illusion.
2) Conscious experience has an essentially subjective character that purely physical processes do not share.
3) The only acceptable explanation of conscious experience is in terms of physical properties alone.

I must hand it to Maverick Philosopher because this trilemma so neatly identifies and clarifies the dominant positions with respect to philosophy of mind. Like him, I am inclined to accept 1) and 2) which entails that I must reject 3). I have some inkling of where other AF members would place their bets but it would be nice to let people weight in and see where the discussion leads.
All three can be true.

1. OK ! Not an illusion.

2. We experience consciousness in a manner different than we experience our heartbeat. We feel our identity, our self, in our mind. The only source of subjective experience is our mind.

3. Yes. It is physical.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
#7
RE: Consciousness Trilemma
(May 23, 2017 at 6:25 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: (*Hat-tip Maverick Philosopher, here)

It appears that of the following three propositions only two can be true:

1) Conscious experience is not an illusion.
2) Conscious experience has an essentially subjective character that purely physical processes do not share.
3) The only acceptable explanation of conscious experience is in terms of physical properties alone.

I must hand it to Maverick Philosopher because this trilemma so neatly identifies and clarifies the dominant positions with respect to philosophy of mind. Like him, I am inclined to accept 1) and 2) which entails that I must reject 3). I have some inkling of where other AF members would place their bets but it would be nice to let people weight in and see where the discussion leads.

All three can be true (or false) since we don't know how consciousness comes about.
If god was real he wouldn't need middle men to explain his wants or do his bidding.
Reply
#8
RE: Consciousness Trilemma
(May 23, 2017 at 6:25 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: It appears that of the following three propositions only two can be true:

1) Conscious experience is not an illusion.
2) Conscious experience has an essentially subjective character that purely physical processes do not share.
3) The only acceptable explanation of conscious experience is in terms of physical properties alone.

My added coloring.

The blue parts are true and the red parts are false.

Consciousness won't be explained in terms of physical properties... consciousness is physical like everything else... and everything is made of the same stuff... that is both physical and experiential... but most stuff is so simplistic and non-complex that it's effectively, in practice, not conscious at all. (Experientiality/consciousness is on a spectrum... things can be more or less conscious. There is no ultimate on/off switch).


Occam's Razor favors monism over dualism...so it makes sense if everything is ultimately made of the same stuff. That stuff making both the physical and the mental... and since only extremely sophisticated combinations of that stuff allows it to be conscious... it makes more sense to say that everything is ultimately physical than everything is ultimately mental.... in that it is less misleading. But both statements "everything is ultimately physical" and "everything is ultimately mental" are technically ultimately true.

Panpsychism in the sense that Galen Strawson means it must be true.

Very few things are conscious but ultimately consciousness and physicality is all made up of the same stuff.

The main thing is it would be misleading to say that everything is conscious in the sense that we normally mean by conscious.

It's more accurate to say that even the things that we think of as unconscious... are ultimately made up of conscious stuff but their experientiality is so reduced that in practice it's identical to what we call unconsciousness. It's like consciousness on a homeopathic level.













(May 24, 2017 at 7:22 am)bennyboy Wrote:
(May 23, 2017 at 6:25 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: It appears that of the following three propositions only two can be true:

1) Conscious experience is not an illusion.

In this context, how would you call conscious experience an illusion?  Usually an illusion IS an experience-- of a physical object or property that is not there, or is there in a form radically different than you perceive it.

It's logically impossible for an illusion of consciousness to not itself be conscious.

Indeed... if something seems conscious then the seeming itself is an experience of consciousness.

Something can't ever seem to be conscious without actually being conscious.

From a first person perspective, I mean.

A robot can seem conscious from my perspective but from its own perspective there is no 'seeming' or consciousness at all. I.e. it doesn't have its own perspective.

Something can't seem to be conscious from a first person perspective without there therefore actually being a conscious first person perpsective.

Indeed, an illusion of an experience is an experience itself.

So consciousness cannot possibly be an illusion. Saying that consciousness might be an illusion is as silly as saying that circles might be square.
Reply
#9
RE: Consciousness Trilemma
Hammy, I think the illusion is that the consciousness is detached from the physical substrate... the brain.
Reply
#10
RE: Consciousness Trilemma
I'd say that's more a delusion than an illusion.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good read on consciousness Apollo 41 2407 January 12, 2021 at 4:04 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  How could we trust our consciousness ?! zainab 45 4462 December 30, 2018 at 9:08 am
Last Post: polymath257
  Trying to simplify my Consciousness hypothesis Won2blv 83 13544 February 21, 2017 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  My thoughts on the Hard problem of consciousness Won2blv 36 5451 February 15, 2017 at 7:27 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  A hypothesis about consciousness Won2blv 12 3898 February 12, 2017 at 9:31 pm
Last Post: Won2blv
  Foundation of all Axioms the Axioms of Consciousness fdesilva 98 13549 September 24, 2016 at 4:36 pm
Last Post: Bunburryist
  Consciousness is simply an illusion emergent of a Boltzmann brain configuration.... maestroanth 36 5390 April 10, 2016 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Little lunch
  On naturalism and consciousness FallentoReason 291 43639 September 15, 2014 at 9:26 pm
Last Post: dissily mordentroge
  Does it make sense to speak of "Universal Consciousness" or "Universal Intelligence"? Mudhammam 253 40820 June 8, 2014 at 12:04 pm
Last Post: Mudhammam
  Can Consciousness Best Be Explained by God's Existence? Rayaan 80 14828 March 31, 2014 at 6:15 pm
Last Post: Rayaan



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)