(September 14, 2012 at 2:11 pm)A Theist Wrote: Sorry DP. I don't see it your way. It's never appropriate or justified to call a woman a 'slut' or a 'whore'. I was hoping that we could have at least had some common ground here and agreed that it's never appropriate under any circumstance. It was wrong for Limbaugh to use the term, 'slut' and it was wrong for Schultz to use it, especially when there's other terms he could have easily used to insult Ingrham politically.
...and once again we're not in disagreement about the use of the term. What part of "tasteless" and "unprofessional" do you not understand?
Where we disagree is you are desperately trying to conflate Schultz's tasteless and unprofessional POLITICAL insult to Ingram with Limbaugh's PERSONAL defamation of character and demands to see a sex tape.
Both are bad. Schultz was bad in a small way. Limbaugh was bad in a big way. Apples and oranges.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
