(September 14, 2012 at 10:25 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:Something we finally agree on. We're past the point where we should agree to disagree. Your little playground game of denial dodgeball has become tiresome. The only thing that you've proven in our exchange is that you're too indoctrinated beyond any capability of fair and rational thinking. This was clearly evident by your naive attempts to absolve the left of its hypocrisy and double standards, disguising them under a veil of false justification. You're far too childish to have a rational conversation with. You don't take disagreement well.(September 14, 2012 at 9:52 pm)A Theist Wrote: You're wrong and you're in denial. Schultz is just as guilty. The term has a particular social stigma attached to it. Schultz is just as guilty as Limbaugh when he used the term 'slut' to defame and disgrace Laura Ingrham on air.
I think we've long past the point where we should agree to disagree here because I can't seem to pound it through your thick skull that defamation of character is worse than having a potty mouth (and the context is clear that Schultz was describing Ingram's political activity, not her personal sexual activity). Fortunately, I believe that I've made my point clearly to any who choose to observe our exchange. I trust it will be as clear to them as it is to me that you're desperate to absolve Rush Limbaugh by trying to paint him as a victim of a double-standard. I've patiently tried to explain why it's not so but you are brain-washed and unable to have a rational conversation.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.