RE: My debate in Christian Forums in full swing
September 15, 2012 at 9:21 am
(This post was last modified: September 15, 2012 at 9:22 am by Drich.)
(September 15, 2012 at 2:24 am)greneknight Wrote: It's obvious. There's no reason to hide. Since you do use the Protestant Bible with 66 books, you might as well come clean and admit it.Actually I have used, debated and included passages from the books of Macabees, Quoted from the wisdoms of Soloman, and referenced passages from susanna when teaching a study on the book of Daniel. So again why do you assume that I am limited to the 66 books of the Cannon of the 'prodestant' bible?
(September 13, 2012 at 11:34 pm)greneknight Wrote: I know of no church council that settled on only the 66 books of the Protestant Bible. Can you tell me which church council that is? Come on, if it's a council you accept, surely you'd know the name of it.Father Athanasius may have provided the orginal list, but he did not have the authority to close the canon of scripture on his own. If you really want to know what council he was apart of then do a google search Maybe you will find something there.
*Note just because History credits one man with an event or feat of some kind does not mean he did it alone.
Quote:If you have no basis to reject the other Church councils, can I assume that you accept ALL church councils?Noope.
Quote: If not, are you then admitting that you reject church councils without basis? What makes you choose which church councils to accept then?Noope, again. Why do you assume that I have accepted or denied anything???
