To the Moderators, please!

[genkaus]

Let's get something straight, I did not agree to a formal debate, I said I would take 'gk' up on his position as a Christian using scriptures.

Let us DO get this straight. So you are willing to debate on an open forum, where there are too many participants that muddle the issue, where you can move as far away from the topic as you like and where you can simply ignore any and all of his arguments or address one or two and walk away claiming victory? And you are NOT willing to debate him on grounds where rules which could and would determine a clear winner - thereby forcing you to face it when you have lost? Coward.

I will stand by what I said and it's this 'gk' is not a scriptural Christian and I can prove it.

Will you now? Let's see -

Deny you're a Christian, why no, I'm telling you as a fact you are not a Christian.

You are not a Christian, the scriptures prove that

In both cases, you say that GK is not a Christian. Here you say that he is not a SCRIPTURAL Christian. Moving the goalposts much?

Well, joke's on you pal. GK has been saying from the very beginning that he is not a SCRIPTURAL Christian - he is a CULTURAL one. As shown by his repeated and consistent disdain for the scriptures.

Now, try to actually stand by what you said and prove that he is not a Christian or else show everybody that you are a liar.

We do not need to waste the debate site to do this, a few scriptures and I will be finished with 'gk'.

Oh, the site doesn't mind. Go ahead - waste it.

The only ones you will see me seriously argue with are those who call their selves Christians and do not stand up to a scriptural description of a Christian.

Then stop cowering and seriously argue with him in the formal debate section. That place, is in fact, made for serious debates.