Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 28, 2025, 8:07 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom
#19
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom
(September 17, 2012 at 1:35 pm)Tiberius Wrote: https://rt.com/news/assange-condom-no-dna-277/

Quote:A ripped condom given to Swedish police by one of Julian Assange’s accusers does not contain the WikiLeaks founder’s DNA, forensic scientists have reportedly found.

In a 100-page document shown to Assange’s lawyers, it was revealed that the torn prophylactic, having been examined by staff at two forensic laboratories, did not bear conclusive evidence that Assange had ever worn it, the Daily Mail reported on Sunday.

Assange’s lawyers said the lack of DNA evidence on the condom, which was allegedly used during a supposed August 2010 sexual assault, indicates that a fake one could have been submitted.

What good does the Aboriginal Nation Passport do? Maybe it's a flying carpet that will take Assange on a flight out of the Embassy to Equador. Big Grin
Reply



Messages In This Thread
No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Tiberius - September 17, 2012 at 1:35 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Minimalist - September 17, 2012 at 1:42 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 1:44 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Phish - September 17, 2012 at 1:45 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 17, 2012 at 1:54 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 2:14 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 17, 2012 at 3:02 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 17, 2012 at 3:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by zappa1258 - September 20, 2012 at 12:16 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by 5thHorseman - September 17, 2012 at 2:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Faith No More - September 17, 2012 at 2:50 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 3:17 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Violet - September 17, 2012 at 3:57 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 4:06 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jackalope - September 17, 2012 at 4:16 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 4:27 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Violet - September 17, 2012 at 5:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 7:38 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by downbeatplumb - September 19, 2012 at 7:21 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by jonb - September 17, 2012 at 4:24 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 17, 2012 at 5:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by greneknight - September 17, 2012 at 5:28 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Haydn - September 17, 2012 at 6:14 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by jonb - September 17, 2012 at 7:31 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 17, 2012 at 7:52 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by jonb - September 17, 2012 at 8:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 10:25 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 17, 2012 at 11:07 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 11:29 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 18, 2012 at 1:44 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 18, 2012 at 6:16 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 18, 2012 at 7:48 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 18, 2012 at 8:08 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 18, 2012 at 8:38 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Violet - September 18, 2012 at 10:05 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 18, 2012 at 1:43 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 18, 2012 at 11:12 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 19, 2012 at 9:32 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 18, 2012 at 11:47 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 19, 2012 at 2:52 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 8:38 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 19, 2012 at 8:44 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 11:08 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 19, 2012 at 11:19 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 11:52 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 19, 2012 at 7:03 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 19, 2012 at 10:26 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 19, 2012 at 5:14 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 19, 2012 at 5:34 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 10:39 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 19, 2012 at 11:05 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 20, 2012 at 2:53 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 20, 2012 at 8:06 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 20, 2012 at 10:29 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 20, 2012 at 10:32 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Shell B - September 20, 2012 at 2:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by zappa1258 - September 20, 2012 at 3:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by LastPoet - September 20, 2012 at 10:43 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Shell B - September 20, 2012 at 3:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by LastPoet - September 22, 2012 at 2:15 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 27, 2012 at 9:09 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Brietbart editor gets torn a new one on Bill Maher NuclearEnergy 8 3304 June 17, 2017 at 12:12 pm
Last Post: Anon2381
  FBI Arrests Ten People With Alleged Ties To Trump and Russian Mafia Secular Elf 7 2758 March 29, 2017 at 9:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Assange interview Napoléon 37 7709 January 11, 2017 at 10:39 am
Last Post: Aristocatt
  Julian Assange and Trump supporters Mechaghostman2 32 6113 December 16, 2016 at 3:49 pm
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  Sexual abuse 'in the DNA of Roman Church' Ziploc Surprise 10 5335 March 11, 2013 at 9:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Senator Assange? Aractus 23 8221 March 3, 2013 at 5:28 pm
Last Post: xXUKAtheistForTheTruthXx
Exclamation DNA Privacy Goes to the Supreme Court Nobody 0 1035 February 27, 2013 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: Nobody
  Senator Julian Assange? Justtristo 5 1985 December 14, 2012 at 5:41 pm
Last Post: Justtristo
  Julian Assange's speech at the Ecuadorian embassy Napoléon 31 9908 August 21, 2012 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)