Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 1, 2025, 6:44 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom
#29
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom
(September 17, 2012 at 11:29 pm)Puddleglum Wrote: 2) If a person is extradited to a country if a third party wishes to extradite him to their country then they must have the permission of both the original country and the one that now holds that person. So it would be twice the trouble to extradite him to the USA, so why is it easier to extradite him from sweden to the USA than from the UK?

(September 18, 2012 at 1:44 am)Moros Synackaon Wrote: I cannot find information as to such, nor a legal mechanism to enforce it. Can you provide some source material?

I've also read this in the news (don't remember where, it was linked off of Google News), but Sweden has already shown blatant disregard for their own law as well as international law regarding extradition.

If they really wanted to interview him, they could do it via video. Supposedly they have a convenient law disallowing this as well.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
Reply



Messages In This Thread
No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Tiberius - September 17, 2012 at 1:35 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Minimalist - September 17, 2012 at 1:42 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 1:44 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Phish - September 17, 2012 at 1:45 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 17, 2012 at 1:54 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 2:14 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 17, 2012 at 3:02 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 17, 2012 at 3:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by zappa1258 - September 20, 2012 at 12:16 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by 5thHorseman - September 17, 2012 at 2:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Faith No More - September 17, 2012 at 2:50 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 3:17 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Violet - September 17, 2012 at 3:57 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 4:06 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jackalope - September 17, 2012 at 4:16 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 4:27 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Violet - September 17, 2012 at 5:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 7:38 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by downbeatplumb - September 19, 2012 at 7:21 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by jonb - September 17, 2012 at 4:24 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 17, 2012 at 5:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by greneknight - September 17, 2012 at 5:28 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Haydn - September 17, 2012 at 6:14 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by jonb - September 17, 2012 at 7:31 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 17, 2012 at 7:52 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by jonb - September 17, 2012 at 8:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 10:25 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 17, 2012 at 11:07 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 11:29 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 18, 2012 at 1:44 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 18, 2012 at 6:16 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 18, 2012 at 7:48 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 18, 2012 at 8:08 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 18, 2012 at 8:38 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Violet - September 18, 2012 at 10:05 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 18, 2012 at 1:43 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 18, 2012 at 11:12 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 19, 2012 at 9:32 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 18, 2012 at 11:47 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 19, 2012 at 2:52 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 8:38 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 19, 2012 at 8:44 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 11:08 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 19, 2012 at 11:19 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 11:52 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 19, 2012 at 7:03 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 19, 2012 at 10:26 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 19, 2012 at 5:14 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 19, 2012 at 5:34 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 10:39 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 19, 2012 at 11:05 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 20, 2012 at 2:53 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 20, 2012 at 8:06 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 20, 2012 at 10:29 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 20, 2012 at 10:32 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Shell B - September 20, 2012 at 2:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by zappa1258 - September 20, 2012 at 3:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by LastPoet - September 20, 2012 at 10:43 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Shell B - September 20, 2012 at 3:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by LastPoet - September 22, 2012 at 2:15 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 27, 2012 at 9:09 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Brietbart editor gets torn a new one on Bill Maher NuclearEnergy 8 3305 June 17, 2017 at 12:12 pm
Last Post: Anon2381
  FBI Arrests Ten People With Alleged Ties To Trump and Russian Mafia Secular Elf 7 2758 March 29, 2017 at 9:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Assange interview Napoléon 37 7726 January 11, 2017 at 10:39 am
Last Post: Aristocatt
  Julian Assange and Trump supporters Mechaghostman2 32 6118 December 16, 2016 at 3:49 pm
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  Sexual abuse 'in the DNA of Roman Church' Ziploc Surprise 10 5341 March 11, 2013 at 9:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Senator Assange? Aractus 23 8231 March 3, 2013 at 5:28 pm
Last Post: xXUKAtheistForTheTruthXx
Exclamation DNA Privacy Goes to the Supreme Court Nobody 0 1037 February 27, 2013 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: Nobody
  Senator Julian Assange? Justtristo 5 1985 December 14, 2012 at 5:41 pm
Last Post: Justtristo
  Julian Assange's speech at the Ecuadorian embassy Napoléon 31 9914 August 21, 2012 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)