RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom
September 18, 2012 at 7:48 am
(This post was last modified: September 18, 2012 at 7:48 am by Puddleglum.)
I've also read this in the news (don't remember where, it was linked off of Google News), but Sweden has already shown blatant disregard for their own law as well as international law regarding extradition.
That sounds like great evidence to me. Surely you can find it if it is out there Sweden is a social democrat country with no great love for the US ,it isn't even a NATO member, couple with which the USA hasn't actually asked for him. Unattributed assertions are worthless. You probably read it on some Assangista website
Sweden cannot prevent a US-backed extradition as it is within the US-Sweden treaties unless a set of conditions (threat of torture, death) is m
yes- it needs permission from the UK to do so.
Gary McKinnon has been fighting the US extradition request for over eight years now. Some would call that a success in preventing extradition, at least to this date.
Whilst people have been packed off for 'crimes' committed in the UK that aren't even illegal in the UK -check out the Nat West 3. The UK is absurdly generous to the US in handing over its citizens. the US has never reciprocated.
Thus, I raise the question, precisely how easy is it to extradite from Sweden compared to the UK? And how might one go about weighing the relative prospects of both?
have you not ever considered finding out?
Explain why Assange should place good faith in the Swedish system.
Because Sweden is a modern northern European country with well established system of checks and balances. Unlike the UK ,for instance, Sweden was a haven for Vietnam war resisters
That sounds like great evidence to me. Surely you can find it if it is out there Sweden is a social democrat country with no great love for the US ,it isn't even a NATO member, couple with which the USA hasn't actually asked for him. Unattributed assertions are worthless. You probably read it on some Assangista website
Sweden cannot prevent a US-backed extradition as it is within the US-Sweden treaties unless a set of conditions (threat of torture, death) is m
yes- it needs permission from the UK to do so.
Gary McKinnon has been fighting the US extradition request for over eight years now. Some would call that a success in preventing extradition, at least to this date.
Whilst people have been packed off for 'crimes' committed in the UK that aren't even illegal in the UK -check out the Nat West 3. The UK is absurdly generous to the US in handing over its citizens. the US has never reciprocated.
Thus, I raise the question, precisely how easy is it to extradite from Sweden compared to the UK? And how might one go about weighing the relative prospects of both?
have you not ever considered finding out?
Explain why Assange should place good faith in the Swedish system.
Because Sweden is a modern northern European country with well established system of checks and balances. Unlike the UK ,for instance, Sweden was a haven for Vietnam war resisters
